Home » Current Events » International
Arab League Plan to Resolve Syrian Crisis Fails in Security Council after Chinese and Russian Vetoes
Page 1 :: [Last: Page 2]
Members of the Security Council failed again yesterday
to agree on a resolution that backed the Arab League plan to bring the Syrian
crisis to an end. The crisis that began last March claimed the lives of more
than 5,500 people according to the United Nations. While 13 Security Council
members voted for the resolution, Russia and China vetoed it thus preventing
resolution to be adopted.
The UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
expressed his disappointment after the Security Council vote saying that it was
undermining the role of the international community and the United Nations at
the time when Government of Syria "must hear a unified voice" of
international community calling for the end of Government's violence against
people of Syria, according to the UN.
The plan of the Arab League called for
"Syrian-led political transition" and the "political
dialogue" between the Syrian Government and the opposition under the
auspices of the Arab League, UN reported.
Although the draft text condemned "all
violence" in Syria "irrespective of where it comes from," the
opposition or the Government, and called for all parties to end it, Ambassador
of Russia to the United Nations Vitaly Churkin after the Security Council vote
insisted that the resolution's draft text "sent an unbalanced signal"
to all parties in Syria with no demands for opposition of Syria to distance
itself from extremist factions. He also said that Russia was taking action and
was sending high-level delegation to President Assad on February 7 to find a
solution and resolve the crisis while on the other hand some members of the
international community have been advocating the change of Syrian regime.
The United States, the United Kingdom,
France, Germany and many other members all expressed outrage over the Russian
and Chinese vetoes, with U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice saying that the Security
Council was held hostage for months while one of the two members
"continues to deliver weapons" to Syria, according to the UN meetings
coverage. She also pointed out that the text itself didn't even call for
targeted sanctions, even though many countries called for them or imposed them.
Furthermore, she underscored that since the two members vetoed an earlier
Security Council action, the Council got reports on possible crimes against
humanity committed by Assad's regime and some 3,000 more Syrian civilians had
been killed including 250 on Friday alone.
Similarly, Ambassador of Germany Peter Wittig
talked about the "crying shame" and how the Council had yet again
failed to live up to its mandate. Although Assad had on December 19 accepted
the demands of the draft, none of the commitments had been met, Ambassador
Wittig stressed. In addition, the vetoed text didn't even make any references
to arms embargo or called for international investigations into violations of
human rights but instead supported political solution set out by the Arab
League, Ambassador Wittig also pointed out. Page 1 :: [Last: Page 2]
|